WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Closing Ceremony of 19th Asian Games Held in HangzhouPeople Participate in Cultural Activities During National Day Holiday Across ChinaChengdu UniversiadeYouth Employment Rate May Improve in AugustNew Semester for Primary and Middle Schools Begins in Urumqi, XinjiangDancing Becomes Popular Entertainment in Taxkorgan, XinjiangOpening Ceremony of Traditional Lhasa Shoton FestivalHighlights of Cultural Activities at Chengdu UniversiadeDanxia National Geological Park in NW China Attracts Tourists with Unique LandscapeReport: Nearly 60 Percent of Women in Flexible Employment Have Stable Average Monthly Earnings